(NOTE: If you’re in the know about WikiLeaks’ history of uncovered Clinton scandals, skip to the middle of this article and read through to the end.)
Whether due to political pressure, blatant bias, death threats, to save face, or just to get a laugh, James Comey has come to the conclusion that Hillary did nothing illegal. For months, everyone who cares about the truth has written about, talked on, and shown proof of criminality from the Clinton’s and their Foundation. And I mean everyone. From regular, every day Americans right up to the highest levels of government. Not Democrats, however. 19
To be clear, this has nothing to do with political partisanship. If Republicans were doing this (and they very well might be 20) there would be an uproar against them as well. But there’s one thing that all those who have a conscience, Democrat or Republican, can agree on: the sexual exploitation of kidnapped and captive children is quite possibly the worst thing a human can do.
The nature of these atrocities was uncovered through the dedication of our fellow citizens, police officers, public servants, and federal law enforcement who all searched through thousands upon thousands of emails; myself included. First, we stumbled onto the DNC’s rigging of the primary election against Bernie Sanders. After that, we found evidence of the mainstream media colluding with the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Debate and interview questions were given to Hillary Clinton ahead of time, among other things. As such, Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile were let go from their respective positions. 21 22
To name just a few more of the hundreds of discoveries:
- Obama lied: he knew about Hillary’s secret server and wrote to her using a pseudonym, cover-up happened (intent to destroy evidence). 2 3 4
- Hillary Clinton took money from and supported terrorist and ISIS funding nations knowing full well what they intended to do with the money. 5 6 7
- Hillary Clinton’s campaign paid people to incite violence at Trump rallies; 8 9 17 which is illegal. 18
- Hillary Clinton’s campaign wants to keep and maintain an “unaware and compliant citizenry”. 10
- Hillary Clinton deleted incriminating emails, the State Department covered it up, and then Hillary asked about using White House executive privilege to hide her activities. 11 12 13 14
- The State Department tried to bribe the FBI to declassify emails during Hillary Clinton’s July FBI investigation 15 16 (this would make it look as if no law had been broken).
The list goes on, and on, and on.1 But not one item on that list has been enough for the FBI to recommend Hillary Clinton be indicted. How this has been possible boggles the mind. In total, 23 24 Hillary Clinton has been under federal investigation on at least seven separate occasions, Bill on four occasions, and the Clinton Foundation is currently under investigation. 25 The FBI has much more time and resources than we regular people have to investigate and discover the above examples of criminality. And yet here we are. Hillary Clinton has been let off the hook by the FBI for the second time this year.
Someone suspected and possibly guilty of bribery, fraud, rigging, mishandling classified information, obstruction of justice, and destruction of evidence should never be President; nor should someone involved with child sex trafficking be President. And yet here we are.
Douglas J. Hagmann is a multi-state licensed private investigator and founder/director of the Northeast Intelligence Network. “Hagmann has worked well over 5,000 cases and is recognized as a surveillance specialist. He has worked as an informational and operational asset for various federal and state law enforcement agencies.” 26
Among Hagmann’s sources is at least one affiliate of the New York Police Department. Before being handed over to the FBI, Anthony Weiner’s investigation was being handled by the NYPD. Hagmann’s source hand delivered to him a printed picture of what appears to be an underage girl sitting, half-naked, at a piano.
That picture was originally found on Weiner’s computer, according to Hagmann. “There is a subtext or coding to some of the emails that Podesta and others, including Hillary and Huma, have been engaged in. For example; ‘pizza party’. That’s not exactly what it means,” he said, later adding that those words have “sexual connotations.” 27
The “subtext” Hagmann is referring to is a pedophilic code. In the interest of saving time and reducing disgust and rage; a shortened pedophile codex is as follows, with links to a prosecuted case involving its use: “Cheese pizza” (CP) = “Child pornography” (CP). 28 29 30 “Pizza party”, then, would be making reference to a pedophilic orgy. “Cheese”, “sauce/pasta”, and “walnuts” refer to attractive young girls, assortments of children, and black children respectively. 31 32 “Map”, then, is an esoteric reference to sex offender maps; i.e., if physical evidence of child sexual abuse is found, such as sperm, the offender would end up on a map of sex offenders like the one below. 33
With this information in mind, the following is an email from Susan Sandler of the Sandler Foundation to John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman: “The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus [sic]? They can send it if you want. I know you’re busy, so feel free not to respond if it’s not yours or you don’t want it.” 34
This one is from Jim Steyer, a ‘child advocate,’ 35 to John Podesta and his wife, Mary: “Hey John, we know you’re a true master of cuisine and we have appreciated that for years … But walnut sauce for the pasta? Mary, plz [sic] tell us the straight story; was the sauce actually very tasty?” 36 In response, Mary Podesta asked if “walnut growing California knows and celebrates walnut pasta sauce?” James Steyer replied: “Indeed, Mary. :). I’m coming to town the week after next and will bring some walnuts!” 37
It would appear that Steyer sincerely thought they were talking about food, because Eryn Sepp—another recipient in the email chain—said of Steyer’s conversation “Haha [Steyer] has no idea what he’s talking about.” 38
This pedophile code was cracked by Reddit and 4chan users in addition to an esteemed private investigator, yet Jim Comey and the FBI, with all their resources, could not do the same.
If word of these atrocities were to get out, the emailers, those being the DNC, Clinton campaign, and Podesta, would need a way to pin the accusations on someone else rather than outright deny them. When pictures like the one Hagmann showed are released in great abundance through leaked emails, screaming “liar” and “Russian hacker” won’t get a pedophile ring out of trouble. They’d have to pin the photos on someone else. Who better to pin child pornography leaks on than the leaker himself, Julian Assange.
And that’s exactly what a shady company tried to do, with the help of the United Nations. 41
On October 7th, WikiLeaks released the first batch of Podesta emails. 42 On October 11th, “prweb.com” released a news story filled to the brim with falsified evidence painting Assange as a pedophile. 43
Put simply, it would seem that someone close to the Clinton Campaign knew Assange had gotten his hands on their emails and attempted to paint Assange as a pedophile to have a cover story for where the leaked child pornography came from in the event that it was released. That cover story was dismantled before it could do any damage. The Russian-pedophile framing operation began in or around May of 2016. 41 That same month, two Nigerian girls who were kidnapped by Islamic terrorist group Boko Haram, one of several Islamic terrorist sects of ISIS, were returned home. 44
In June of 2016, WorldNews reported that the Clinton Foundation and Hillary’s State Department had been working with Boko Haram in yet another attempt at regime change and election meddling—and maybe something a bit more sinister. From 2009 to 2013 Hillary refused to designate Boko Haram as an official Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) in spite of intense pressure from both political parties to do so. 48
The Clinton’s and Obama’s both were strong voices in the “#BringBackOurGirls” movement, but neither lifted a finger to find, and/or aid the retrieval of, those girls. 49 Neither did the United Nations. 50
That could be because those Nigerian schoolgirls were “walnuts” that needed harvesting. After all, every single one of those “walnut” emails were sent after April 4th, 2014, 34 36 37 38 39 40 the day 200 Nigerian schoolgirls were kidnapped by a Clinton-backed sect of ISIS.